Still, Nike is a publicly owned firm whose goal is to improve the wealth of its shareholders. Nikkei successfully pressed its suppliers to improve the working conditions in the factory. In doing so, Nike may find that it receives some public relations benefit rather than Sweatshops continue to exist because of economic and social circumstances and have become integrated in various cultures, especially in emerging and developing countries.
Global managers for Nikkei have had to make some strategic and operational changes in the manufacturing area without having a negative affect for the stakeholders. If Nike had chosen to make improved working conditions a part of the arrangement, then those benefits may have been passed on to the workers.
These factory workers are often displaced agricultural workers, sometimes illiterate, and possibly have no marketable skills.
Governments In developing countries frequently permit and support sweatshops because the whitewash create tax revenues and other income. If it insisted on prevailing conditions in the United States, there would be little reason for Nike to seek contractors from outside countries.
Certainly the pay and working conditions that the workers of subcontractors receive is due in large part to the contract that has been negotiated by Nike.
However, through pressure or contractual concessions, it is possible for Nike to seek ways to improve the conditions of workers in supplying countries. The workers in these Asian countries were happy, even eager, to accept the conditions that were provided as a manufacturer of Nike.
Although Nike may be technically removed from responsibility in some areas, it clearly has the obligation to be certain that exploitation by subcontractors do not occur. In Christine Basics conducted a study and found that Nikkei had closed all U.
Clearly, Nike has the responsibility to hold suppliers to those conditions that prevail only in the supplying countries. Should Nike be held responsible for working conditions in foreign factories that it does not own, but where sub-contractors make products for Nike? If Nike were to leave the country because of the pressures placed upon it, the workers would undoubtedly suffer greatly.
They may have no choice but to accept the conditions of sweatshop work or face starvation. This was in violation of the Chinese labor and minimum wage requirement laws.
The global managers have faced strategic and operational challenges. These facilities are located in countries that are trying to improve their global economies and do not have the same workplace standards mound in the U. Hire Writer The host country governments have played a role this global business operation.
Factories and moved production to overseas subcontracted facilities. The Sweatshop Debate 1.business presented in the Nike sweatshop debate case study.
The paper determines the various roles that the Vietnamese government played in this global business operation. This paper summarizes the strategic and operational challenges facing global managers illustrated in the Nike sweatshop case.
Nike: The Sweatshop Debate (Case Study)In today's business world, a company's ethical behavior is constantly under the microscope; and more specifically, the 4/5(2).
Answer the 7 questions in the Case Study 1: Nike: The Sweatshop Debate? 1. Should Nike be held responsible for working conditions in foreign factories that it does not own, but where subcontractors make products for Nike? 2. Case Study: The Nike Sweatshop Debate PAGE * Arabic 1 Case Study: The Nike Sweatshop Debate Established in by former University of Oregon track star Phil Knight, Nike is one of the leading global designers and marketers of athletic shoes and apparel.
"Nike: The Sweatshop Debate" Case Study This paper describes the legal, cultural, and ethical challenges that confronted the global business presented in the Nike sweatshop debate case study.
It illustrates Nike’s part in the sweatshop scandal and it also takes a look at the ethical issues that surround this touchy subject.
Case Study "Nike: The Sweatshop Debate" MGT Case Study "Nike: The Sweatshop Debate" “We’ve run the course – from establishing codes of conduct and pulling together an internal team to enforce it, to working external bodies to monitor factories %(6).Download